Blog > Counting and Solving Final Fantasy XIII-2’s Clock Puzzles

Counting and Solving Final Fantasy XIII-2’s Clock Puzzles

February 6th, 2012

Final Fantasy XIII-2 is a role-playing game, released last week in North America, that contains an abundance of mini-games. One of the more interesting mini-games is the “clock puzzle”, which presents the user with N integers arranged in a circle, with each integer being from 1 to \(\lfloor N/2 \rfloor\).

A challenging late-game clock puzzle with N = 12

The way the game works is as follows:

  1. The user may start by picking any of the N positions on the circle. Call the number in this position M.
  2. You now have the option of picking either the number M positions clockwise from your last choice, or M positions counter-clockwise from your last choice. Update the value of M to be the number in the new position that you chose.
  3. Repeat step 2 until you have performed it N-1 times.

You win the game if you choose each of the N positions exactly once, and you lose the game otherwise (if you are forced to choose the same position twice, or equivalently if there is a position that you have not chosen after performing step 2 a total of N-1 times). During the game, N ranges from 5 to 13, though N could theoretically be as large as we like.


To demonstrate the rules in action, consider the following simple example with N = 6 (I have labelled the six positions 05 in blue for easy reference):

If we start by choosing the 1 in position 1, then we have the option of choosing the 3 in either position 0 or 2. Let’s choose the 3 in position 0. Three moves either clockwise or counter-clockwise from here both give the 1 in position 3, so that is our only possible next choice. We continue on in this way, going through the N = 6 positions in the order 103425, as in the following image:

We have now selected each position exactly once, so we are done – we solved the puzzle! In fact, this is the unique solution for the given puzzle.

Counting Clock Puzzles

Let’s work on determining how many different clock puzzles there are of a given size. As mentioned earlier, a clock puzzle with N positions has an integer in the interval \([1, \lfloor N/2 \rfloor]\) in each of the  positions. There are thus \(\lfloor N/2 \rfloor^N\) distinct clock puzzles with N positions, which grows very quickly with N – its values for N = 1, 2, 3, … are given by the sequence 0, 1, 1, 16, 32, 729, 2187, 65536, 262144, … (A206344 in the OEIS).

However, this rather crude count of the number of clock puzzles ignores the fact that some clock puzzles have no solution. To illustrate this fact, we present the following simple proposition:

Proposition. There are unsolvable clock puzzles with N positions if and only if N = 4 or N ≥ 6.

To prove this proposition, first note that the clock puzzles for N = 2 or N = 3 are trivially solvable, since each number in the puzzle is forced to be \(\lfloor N/2 \rfloor = 1\). The 32 clock puzzles in the N = 5 case can all easily be shown to be solvable via computer brute force (does anyone have a simple or elegant argument for this case?).

In the N = 4 case, exactly 3 of the 16 clock puzzles are unsolvable:

To complete the proof, it suffices to demonstrate an unsolvable clock puzzle for each N ≥ 6. To this end, we begin by considering the following clock puzzle in the N = 6 case:

The above puzzle is unsolvable because the only way to reach position 0 is to select it first, but from there only one of positions 2 or 4 can be reached – not both. This example generalizes in a straightforward manner to any N ≥ 6 simply by adding more 1’s to the bottom: it will still be necessary to choose position 0 first, and then it is impossible to reach both position 2 and position N-2 from there.

There doesn’t seem to be an elegant way to count the number of solvable clock puzzles with N positions (which is most likely related to the apparent difficulty of solving these puzzles, which will be discussed in the next section), so let’s count the number of solvable clock puzzles via brute force. Simply constructing each of the \(\lfloor N/2 \rfloor^N\) clock puzzles and determining which of them are solvable (via the MATLAB script linked at the end of this post) shows that the number of solvable clock puzzles for N = 1, 2, 3, … is given by the sequence 0, 1, 1, 13, 32, 507, 1998, 33136, 193995, … (A206345 in the OEIS).

This count of puzzles is perhaps still unsatisfying, though, since it counts puzzles that are simply mirror images or rotations of each other multiple times. Again, there doesn’t seem to be an elegant counting argument for enumerating the solvable clock puzzles up to rotation and reflection, so we compute this sequence by brute force: 0, 1, 1, 4, 8, 72, 236, 3665, 19037, … (A206346 in the OEIS).

Solving Clock Puzzles

Clock puzzles are one of the most challenging parts of Final Fantasy XIII-2, and with good reason: they are a well-studied graph theory problem in disguise. We can consider each clock puzzle with N positions as a directed graph with N vertices. If position N contains the number M, then there is a directed edge going from vertex N to the vertices M positions clockwise and counter-clockwise from it. In other words, we consider a clock puzzle as a directed graph on N vertices, where the directed edges describe the valid moves around the circle.

The directed graph corresponding to the earlier (solvable) N = 6 example

The problem of solving a clock puzzle is then exactly the problem of finding a directed Hamiltonian path on the associated graph. Because finding a directed Hamiltonian path in general is NP-hard, this seems to suggest that solving clock puzzles might be as well. There of course is the problem that the directed graphs relevant to this problem have very special structure – in particular, every vertex has outdegree ≤ 2, and the graph has a symmetry property that results from clockwise/counter-clockwise movement allowed in the clock puzzles.

The main result of [1] shows that the fact that the outdegree of each vertex is no larger than 2 is no real help: finding directed Hamiltonian paths is still NP-hard given such a promise. However, the symmetry condition seems more difficult to characterize in graph theoretic terms, and could potentially be exploited to produce a fast algorithm for solving these puzzles.

Regardless of the problem’s computational complexity, the puzzles found in the game are quite small (N ≤ 13), so they can be easily solved by brute force. Attached is a MATLAB script (solve_clock.m) that can be used to solve clock puzzles. The first input argument is a vector containing the numeric values in each of the positions, starting from the top and reading clockwise. By default, only one solution is computed. To compute all solutions, set the second (optional) input argument to 1.

The output of the script is either a vector of positions (labelled 0 through N-1, with 0 referring to the top position, 1 referring to one position clockwise from there, and so on) describing an order in which you can visit the positions to solve the puzzle, or 0 if there is no solution.

For example, the script can be used to find our solution to the N = 6 example provided earlier:

>> solve_clock([3,1,3,1,2,3])

ans =
    1 0 3 4 2 5

Similarly, the script can be used to find all four solutions [Update, October 1, 2013: Whoops, there are six solutions! See the comments.] to the puzzle in the screenshot at the very top of this post:

>> solve_clock([6,5,1,4,2,1,6,4,2,1,5,2], 1)

ans =
    3 7 11 9 10 5 4 2 1 8 6 0
    7 3 11 9 10 5 4 2 1 8 6 0
    9 10 5 4 2 3 7 11 1 8 6 0
    9 8 10 5 4 2 3 7 11 1 6 0



  1. J. Plesnik. The NP-completeness of the Hamiltonian cycle problem in planar digraphs with degree bound two. Inform. Process. Lett., 8:199–201, 1979.
  1. Eddie
    February 6th, 2012 at 14:13 | #1

    Cool article! I think there may have been some typos though:

    The screencap at the very beginning shows a circle with twelve integers around it, with N = 12. But in the first diagram example, it’s claimed that N = 5 (though there appear to be six integers around the circle), and it’s also claimed that the labels run from 0-6, though they appear to run from 0-5.

  2. February 6th, 2012 at 14:25 | #2

    @Eddie – Whoops, thanks for the corrections!

  3. February 6th, 2012 at 16:27 | #3

    Hey Nathaniel–these puzzles can actually be up 13 circles in size as far as I know from playing the game. Also, there CAN be sixes in the puzzles, as I know also from totally binging on the game this weekend. If you need proof, check this youtube footage from the JP version of the game (it’s exactly the same game except in Japanese obviously), specifically around 6:35.

    Anyway, I already wrote a blog entry with my own analysis of this as well–I found yours more interesting though, more developed, nice job! ^_^

  4. February 6th, 2012 at 16:34 | #4

    @Jessie – Thanks for the link (but I think you accidentally copy/pasted the wrong link the first time — it just points to this post :)). I don’t recall any N = 13 puzzles, but you’re probably right. And yep, there are sixes in the puzzle even in the screenshot at the top of this post (they are the pink-ish digits that barely look like numbers).

  5. February 6th, 2012 at 16:36 | #5

    Jessie :If you need proof, check this youtube footage from the JP version of the game (it’s exactly the same game except in Japanese obviously), specifically around 6:35.

    Sorry, I meant:

  6. February 6th, 2012 at 16:42 | #6

    @Jessie – Thanks for the updated link. However, the puzzle at 6:35 in that video only seems to have 12 positions, right?

  7. February 6th, 2012 at 16:50 | #7

    Gahh…I’m sorry I was misreading things (a bit tired, it happens). For some reason the first commenter’s comment came out as there only being the numbers 1-5 on the spaces, so I gave a 12 space example to disprove.

    Here’s your 13 space example though, at 27:10.

  8. February 6th, 2012 at 17:25 | #8

    @Jessie – Ah, thanks for the video! I’ve corrected the post accordingly 🙂

  9. Gabriel Aumala
    February 7th, 2012 at 11:40 | #9

    Oh! This is an amazing article!
    I stopped reading at “Solving Clock Puzzles” because I still don’t get my copy of the game. I will read it after solving a few puzzles. I can’t wait!

  10. February 10th, 2012 at 01:22 | #10

    I was searching the internet thinking about the underlying structure of the clock puzzle, and I found your write up. You did a fantastic job on it; thanks for taking the time to write it!

  11. Cole
    April 6th, 2012 at 23:14 | #11

    Thx man saved me ALOT of time.

  12. Michelle
    February 5th, 2013 at 01:21 | #12


  13. Kamen Petroff
    March 28th, 2013 at 05:35 | #13

    There is a minor bug in your maple program in the case you are looking for all solutions. In the last 2-3 lines you are loosing solutions, by not looking in the opposite direction, i.e. there are 6 solutions in your example:

    [3, 7, 11, 9, 10, 5, 4, 2, 1, 8, 6, 0]
    [3, 7, 11, 9, 8, 10, 5, 4, 2, 1, 6, 0]
    [7, 3, 11, 9, 10, 5, 4, 2, 1, 8, 6, 0]
    [7, 3, 11, 9, 8, 10, 5, 4, 2, 1, 6, 0]
    [9, 10, 5, 4, 2, 3, 7, 11, 1, 8, 6, 0]
    [9, 8, 10, 5, 4, 2, 3, 7, 11, 1, 6, 0]

  14. Mark Pearson
    June 5th, 2014 at 07:07 | #14

    I have got matlab so trying to turn your code into C# via the Matlab documentation

    tot_sol= [tot_sol;sol]
    this line in need help with and max(csol == newint)
    Any help would be of appreciated

  15. warren
    February 12th, 2016 at 22:49 | #15

    Thank you.. ff132 puzzle solver

  16. Raka
    January 26th, 2017 at 09:57 | #16

    Im still confusing about this

  1. February 6th, 2012 at 15:22 | #1
  2. February 6th, 2012 at 16:20 | #2
  3. May 5th, 2016 at 15:16 | #3